Skip to Main Content
All Podcasts

Theranostics and Clinical Trials for GI Cancers

Transcript

  • 00:00 --> 00:03Funding for Yale Cancer Answers is
  • 00:03 --> 00:06provided by Smilow Cancer Hospital.
  • 00:06 --> 00:08Welcome to Yale Cancer Answers
  • 00:08 --> 00:10with Doctor Anees Chagpar.
  • 00:10 --> 00:11Yale Cancer Answers features the
  • 00:11 --> 00:13latest information on cancer care
  • 00:13 --> 00:14by welcoming oncologists and
  • 00:14 --> 00:17specialists who are on the forefront
  • 00:17 --> 00:18of the battle to fight cancer.
  • 00:18 --> 00:21This week it's a conversation about
  • 00:21 --> 00:23theranostics and clinical trials for GI
  • 00:23 --> 00:25cancers with Doctor Gabriella Spilberg.
  • 00:25 --> 00:27Dr. Spilberg is an assistant professor
  • 00:27 --> 00:29of radiology and biomedical imaging
  • 00:29 --> 00:31at the Yale School of Medicine,
  • 00:31 --> 00:33where Doctor Chagpar is a professor
  • 00:33 --> 00:34of surgical oncology.
  • 00:35 --> 00:38Gabriella, maybe we can start off by
  • 00:38 --> 00:40you telling us a little bit more about
  • 00:40 --> 00:44yourself and what it is you do.
  • 00:44 --> 00:47I started nuclear medicine basically
  • 00:47 --> 00:50in about 2018 when I went to
  • 00:50 --> 00:53train at Dana Farber in Boston,
  • 00:53 --> 00:57and I didn't know much about it when I first
  • 00:57 --> 01:01got in contact with this interesting field.
  • 01:01 --> 01:05I'm originally from Brazil, and I trained
  • 01:05 --> 01:08previously in Brazil and in Brazil
  • 01:08 --> 01:12this was not something that was
  • 01:12 --> 01:15widely available or
  • 01:15 --> 01:17in practice back then,
  • 01:17 --> 01:20so when I came here and I first
  • 01:20 --> 01:23encountered this field where you were not
  • 01:23 --> 01:26really looking at anatomic structures,
  • 01:26 --> 01:29but you were looking at molecular processes
  • 01:29 --> 01:33and what was happening at the cellular level,
  • 01:33 --> 01:34that really intrigued me.
  • 01:34 --> 01:38And it really changed how you see
  • 01:38 --> 01:41imaging and everything around imaging.
  • 01:41 --> 01:47And then back in 2018 was about when
  • 01:47 --> 01:49one of the big drugs for a neuroendocrine
  • 01:49 --> 01:51cancer was approved.
  • 01:55 --> 01:58When you see that things are
  • 01:58 --> 02:02not really just a visual structure
  • 02:02 --> 02:05but you can see what's happening,
  • 02:05 --> 02:09it just changed my whole conception about
  • 02:09 --> 02:13what imaging could be and what was happening.
  • 02:13 --> 02:17So that's what got me so interested.
  • 02:17 --> 02:21When I decided that there
  • 02:21 --> 02:24was not really a step back into this
  • 02:24 --> 02:27field because this was just the next
  • 02:27 --> 02:30level and what the future will be,
  • 02:30 --> 02:32it was very clear to me that
  • 02:32 --> 02:33this was my path.
  • 02:33 --> 02:37So I stayed at Dana Farber for about
  • 02:37 --> 02:41two years and that's when I really
  • 02:41 --> 02:45had a very extensive experience and
  • 02:45 --> 02:48deep dive into what was happening
  • 02:48 --> 02:51and how these things were done.
  • 02:54 --> 02:59Basically this is when I acquired
  • 02:59 --> 03:02my foundational knowledge.
  • 03:03 --> 03:06Maybe we can take a step back.
  • 03:06 --> 03:08I mean it sounds like this
  • 03:08 --> 03:11is very futuristic,
  • 03:11 --> 03:13forward-looking career path,
  • 03:13 --> 03:16but for our audience,
  • 03:16 --> 03:18maybe you can tell us a
  • 03:18 --> 03:20little bit more about what
  • 03:20 --> 03:22exactly is theranostics?
  • 03:22 --> 03:25Theranostics is when you take an
  • 03:25 --> 03:30agent which has a specific target.
  • 03:30 --> 03:33So let's say for neuroendocrine
  • 03:33 --> 03:36cancers you're looking to somatostatin
  • 03:36 --> 03:39receptors and when you see this target,
  • 03:39 --> 03:42this agent binds into it and
  • 03:42 --> 03:46sends a signal and the signal
  • 03:46 --> 03:48we were able to see where
  • 03:48 --> 03:50the signal is sent from.
  • 03:50 --> 03:54So when you use the same agent
  • 03:54 --> 03:59that you detect a specific cell
  • 03:59 --> 04:01and then you bind into another agent,
  • 04:01 --> 04:06which now has a different behavior and is
  • 04:06 --> 04:09basically a radiation therapy agent and
  • 04:09 --> 04:14we inject the same agent in your vein.
  • 04:14 --> 04:16It again binds into the tumor
  • 04:16 --> 04:18cell that you're targeting and
  • 04:18 --> 04:20now it destroys the tumor cell.
  • 04:20 --> 04:25So the concept of being able to use a
  • 04:25 --> 04:29diagnostic biomarker and translate that
  • 04:29 --> 04:30into a therapeutic agent,
  • 04:30 --> 04:34that's when you get to the theranostics.
  • 04:40 --> 04:43This theranostics concept when you use the
  • 04:43 --> 04:47exact same molecule to look and to
  • 04:47 --> 04:50treat a certain pathology or disease.
  • 04:51 --> 04:53And so that seems to play
  • 04:53 --> 04:56into this whole concept that we've
  • 04:56 --> 04:58talked about on the show previously
  • 04:58 --> 05:00about you know, targeted therapies.
  • 05:00 --> 05:03Usually we talk about targeted
  • 05:03 --> 05:05therapies for chemotherapy or
  • 05:05 --> 05:07immunotherapy where we're looking
  • 05:07 --> 05:09at a particular biomarker.
  • 05:09 --> 05:12But here it sounds like you're delivering
  • 05:12 --> 05:15radiation with the same kind of concept.
  • 05:15 --> 05:16Is that right?
  • 05:16 --> 05:18Yes, that is exactly right.
  • 05:18 --> 05:21So this is a targeted therapy, so you
  • 05:21 --> 05:24choose your target and there
  • 05:24 --> 05:27are a lot of these targets
  • 05:27 --> 05:30being developed in the pipeline,
  • 05:30 --> 05:35and each specific cancer usually will have
  • 05:35 --> 05:40a specific target that you want to reach,
  • 05:40 --> 05:43and the idea is to always
  • 05:43 --> 05:45hit targets which are
  • 05:45 --> 05:47present in cancer cells,
  • 05:47 --> 05:50but not in normal body cells.
  • 05:50 --> 05:55So as we move forward into more
  • 05:55 --> 05:57personalized and better precision therapies
  • 05:57 --> 06:01where when we talk about these words,
  • 06:01 --> 06:04we're talking about things that
  • 06:04 --> 06:06will target the diseased cells
  • 06:06 --> 06:08and not the normal cells.
  • 06:08 --> 06:12And again then you use this target and you
  • 06:12 --> 06:16bind into an agent that is capable of
  • 06:16 --> 06:17delivering radiation,
  • 06:17 --> 06:20and this radiation goes inside the vein.
  • 06:20 --> 06:23It doesn't come from outside of your body,
  • 06:23 --> 06:26as when patients go for radiation therapy.
  • 06:26 --> 06:29It's really injected into the blood,
  • 06:29 --> 06:30just like a blood draw.
  • 06:30 --> 06:33You inject into an IV or when you
  • 06:33 --> 06:35have an infusion and then this
  • 06:35 --> 06:37travels throughout your bloodstream
  • 06:37 --> 06:41and it reaches a target to bind and
  • 06:41 --> 06:43deliver the radiation in a very
  • 06:43 --> 06:46precise way and very controlled way.
  • 06:46 --> 06:49In the exact location that you're
  • 06:49 --> 06:53targeting and this is really where
  • 06:53 --> 06:56a lot of things are trending
  • 06:56 --> 06:59because we're we're looking into
  • 06:59 --> 07:03disrupting the cancer processes without
  • 07:03 --> 07:07influencing the normal cellular process.
  • 07:08 --> 07:09And so when we think about that,
  • 07:09 --> 07:12I mean on the one hand you think, gosh,
  • 07:12 --> 07:14this may really reduce side effects
  • 07:14 --> 07:17because you are minimizing the dose
  • 07:17 --> 07:19that you're giving to normal tissues.
  • 07:19 --> 07:23So presumably you will have less of
  • 07:23 --> 07:26the side effects that are associated
  • 07:26 --> 07:27with treating normal tissues.
  • 07:27 --> 07:29On the other hand,
  • 07:29 --> 07:31the concept of delivering
  • 07:31 --> 07:33radiation through a vein,
  • 07:33 --> 07:35albeit in a targeted way,
  • 07:35 --> 07:38may induce some other side effects.
  • 07:38 --> 07:39So can you
  • 07:39 --> 07:41tell us a little bit more
  • 07:41 --> 07:42about the side effect profile
  • 07:42 --> 07:45of this kind of modality?
  • 07:45 --> 07:49Sure, yes, that is exactly the point.
  • 07:49 --> 07:52When you deliver something in the blood,
  • 07:52 --> 07:54you have a target, but not always.
  • 07:54 --> 07:57The target is only expressed
  • 07:57 --> 07:59in tumoral cells
  • 07:59 --> 08:01or only the target ends up
  • 08:01 --> 08:03in only tumorous cells.
  • 08:03 --> 08:07For example, the kidney filtrates the blood.
  • 08:07 --> 08:09So when you deliver these
  • 08:09 --> 08:11radiation therapies in the vein,
  • 08:11 --> 08:14eventually you will have radiation
  • 08:14 --> 08:17agents crossing through your kidneys.
  • 08:17 --> 08:20So there are side effects related
  • 08:20 --> 08:23to where the cells circulate and
  • 08:23 --> 08:26to other locations that also
  • 08:26 --> 08:29express this type of target.
  • 08:29 --> 08:32That is present in whatever
  • 08:32 --> 08:33therapy you're using.
  • 08:33 --> 08:35So for example,
  • 08:35 --> 08:38the bone marrow receives a certain
  • 08:38 --> 08:41dose of radiation and we control that.
  • 08:41 --> 08:44We know the exact dosage which
  • 08:44 --> 08:47is toxic for the bone marrow.
  • 08:47 --> 08:48And we always,
  • 08:48 --> 08:51when we're looking into our patient
  • 08:51 --> 08:54who is a candidate for these therapies,
  • 08:54 --> 08:57we have to make sure that the
  • 08:57 --> 08:59bone marrow is functional
  • 08:59 --> 09:01enough to receive that.
  • 09:01 --> 09:03And the other issue usually
  • 09:03 --> 09:06is kidney function, which
  • 09:06 --> 09:10we know that as the radiation
  • 09:10 --> 09:12circulates into the blood,
  • 09:12 --> 09:16there is a part of it that will
  • 09:16 --> 09:17end up in the kidneys.
  • 09:17 --> 09:18So we control for that.
  • 09:18 --> 09:21We make sure that the function of
  • 09:21 --> 09:24the kidney and the marrow are within
  • 09:24 --> 09:26as normal as possible or within
  • 09:26 --> 09:29acceptable range to have these therapies.
  • 09:30 --> 09:34Usually the side effects are
  • 09:34 --> 09:37really different from traditional
  • 09:37 --> 09:41chemotherapy as I just mentioned.
  • 09:41 --> 09:43Yeah, and different from
  • 09:43 --> 09:45traditional radiation therapy as
  • 09:45 --> 09:47well because radiation therapy as
  • 09:47 --> 09:50you had mentioned previously is
  • 09:50 --> 09:52generally given from the outside.
  • 09:52 --> 09:55So oftentimes when we give radiation there
  • 09:55 --> 09:58are skin changes and so on and so forth.
  • 09:58 --> 10:00You would think that a lot of
  • 10:00 --> 10:01that would not be present
  • 10:01 --> 10:02when delivering radiation
  • 10:02 --> 10:04from the inside.
  • 10:04 --> 10:06Yes, that's accurate.
  • 10:06 --> 10:10There is a very hypothetical
  • 10:10 --> 10:14risk of you having an infiltration
  • 10:14 --> 10:16as you deliver these therapies.
  • 10:16 --> 10:18So there's a little leakage
  • 10:18 --> 10:20around the vessel that happens
  • 10:20 --> 10:22with this high dose radiation.
  • 10:22 --> 10:23But usually we're very careful.
  • 10:23 --> 10:26We always test the veins, we observe
  • 10:26 --> 10:30as the therapy is ongoing to make
  • 10:30 --> 10:32sure there's no fluid extravasation
  • 10:32 --> 10:34from the veins.
  • 10:34 --> 10:36So usually this is
  • 10:36 --> 10:39a very, very rare complication
  • 10:39 --> 10:42to have any cutaneous effect,
  • 10:42 --> 10:44and that would really be
  • 10:44 --> 10:46related to the infusion itself,
  • 10:46 --> 10:48but usually that's not the problem.
  • 10:48 --> 10:51And then for radiation,
  • 10:51 --> 10:52sometimes,
  • 10:52 --> 10:55for example if you're radiating the lungs,
  • 10:55 --> 10:58you can have the heart very close
  • 10:58 --> 11:00to the lungs and you can have
  • 11:00 --> 11:02some kind of damage to the heart.
  • 11:02 --> 11:06Which is for us when we're doing intravenous,
  • 11:06 --> 11:08that's not really a problem of
  • 11:08 --> 11:11the anatomy of where things are.
  • 11:11 --> 11:13The radiation with the liver
  • 11:13 --> 11:14doesn't travel very far.
  • 11:14 --> 11:17These particles travel very,
  • 11:17 --> 11:21very small range and they really
  • 11:21 --> 11:24are from where they bind,
  • 11:24 --> 11:29the effect is really very local.
  • 11:29 --> 11:31So adjacent organs
  • 11:31 --> 11:36are usually not the problem.
  • 11:36 --> 11:38It sounds like, you know,
  • 11:38 --> 11:42this is really potentially a wonderful
  • 11:42 --> 11:44way of delivering radiation.
  • 11:44 --> 11:47If you can spare adjacent organs,
  • 11:47 --> 11:49you can spare a lot of the
  • 11:49 --> 11:51cutaneous side effects that we
  • 11:51 --> 11:52see with traditional radiation.
  • 11:52 --> 11:55And as you mentioned,
  • 11:55 --> 11:58many cancers these days have potential
  • 11:58 --> 12:01targets and more and more are being
  • 12:01 --> 12:03discovered and developed every day.
  • 12:03 --> 12:07But is this really something that is
  • 12:07 --> 12:10being offered for all kinds of cancers?
  • 12:10 --> 12:13Does it have a role in particular
  • 12:13 --> 12:16types of cancers or is this
  • 12:16 --> 12:18something that is still kind of
  • 12:18 --> 12:20working its way through clinical
  • 12:20 --> 12:23trials or is this actually something
  • 12:23 --> 12:24that's ready for prime time?
  • 12:26 --> 12:30So the first therapy that was approved
  • 12:30 --> 12:33for neuroendocrine cancers in the
  • 12:33 --> 12:36United States happened in 2018.
  • 12:36 --> 12:39So this is something that's been
  • 12:39 --> 12:41widespread and commercially
  • 12:41 --> 12:44available for four years now.
  • 12:44 --> 12:47So it's a new technology even
  • 12:47 --> 12:49though there has been other
  • 12:49 --> 12:53uses in elsewhere in the world,
  • 12:53 --> 12:56particularly Europe and Australia.
  • 12:56 --> 12:59They have been leading places
  • 12:59 --> 13:01for these therapies.
  • 13:07 --> 13:11As we move into more knowledge
  • 13:11 --> 13:16of this latest therapy we
  • 13:16 --> 13:20are just expanding their use.
  • 13:20 --> 13:23So usually how these work is
  • 13:23 --> 13:25they get approved into the end
  • 13:25 --> 13:28of cycle of therapy of a disease
  • 13:28 --> 13:31when patients don't have a lot
  • 13:31 --> 13:34of therapy options and
  • 13:34 --> 13:37then start working the way back
  • 13:37 --> 13:39into looking how these therapies
  • 13:39 --> 13:43do earlier in the disease cycle and then
  • 13:43 --> 13:45by understanding that a little better,
  • 13:45 --> 13:49that's how these get more widely spread.
  • 13:49 --> 13:51So we'll pick up this conversation,
  • 13:51 --> 13:53but first we need to take a
  • 13:53 --> 13:55short break for medical minute.
  • 13:55 --> 13:57Please stay tuned to learn more about
  • 13:57 --> 13:59the role of theranostics with my
  • 13:59 --> 14:01guest doctor Gabriella Spilberg.
  • 14:01 --> 14:03Funding for Yale Cancer Answers is
  • 14:03 --> 14:05provided by Smilow Cancer Hospital,
  • 14:05 --> 14:07where their survivorship clinic is available
  • 14:07 --> 14:10to educate survivors on the prevention,
  • 14:10 --> 14:12detection, and treatment of complications
  • 14:12 --> 14:14resulting from cancer treatment.
  • 14:14 --> 14:18Smilowcancerhospital.org.
  • 14:18 --> 14:21The American Cancer Society estimates that
  • 14:21 --> 14:23over 200,000 cases of Melanoma will be
  • 14:23 --> 14:26diagnosed in the United States this year,
  • 14:26 --> 14:29with over 1000 patients in Connecticut alone.
  • 14:29 --> 14:31While Melanoma accounts for only
  • 14:31 --> 14:34about 1% of skin cancer cases,
  • 14:34 --> 14:37it causes the most skin cancer deaths,
  • 14:37 --> 14:38but when detected early,
  • 14:38 --> 14:41it is easily treated and highly curable.
  • 14:41 --> 14:43Clinical trials are currently
  • 14:43 --> 14:45underway at federally designated
  • 14:45 --> 14:47Comprehensive cancer centers such as
  • 14:47 --> 14:49Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer
  • 14:49 --> 14:51Hospital to test innovative new
  • 14:51 --> 14:53treatments for Melanoma. The goal of
  • 14:53 --> 14:55the specialized programs of research
  • 14:55 --> 14:58excellence in skin Cancer Grant is to
  • 14:58 --> 15:00better understand the biology of skin cancer,
  • 15:00 --> 15:02where the focus on discovering
  • 15:02 --> 15:04targets that will lead to improved
  • 15:04 --> 15:06diagnosis and treatment.
  • 15:06 --> 15:08More information is available
  • 15:08 --> 15:09at yalecancercenter.org.
  • 15:09 --> 15:12You're listening to Connecticut public radio.
  • 15:14 --> 15:16Welcome back to Yale Cancer Answers.
  • 15:16 --> 15:18This is doctor Anees Chagpar,
  • 15:18 --> 15:20and I'm joined tonight by my guest,
  • 15:20 --> 15:22Doctor Gabriela Spilberg.
  • 15:22 --> 15:23We're talking about theranostics
  • 15:23 --> 15:26and clinical trials for GI cancers.
  • 15:26 --> 15:28And right before the break, Gabriela,
  • 15:28 --> 15:32you were starting to tell us about how
  • 15:32 --> 15:34theranostics and in fact many therapies
  • 15:34 --> 15:37find their way into clinical practice.
  • 15:37 --> 15:40So you started by saying that
  • 15:40 --> 15:42usually these are, you know,
  • 15:42 --> 15:45looked at in the setting
  • 15:45 --> 15:48of situations where individuals may
  • 15:48 --> 15:51not have other options and then gradually
  • 15:51 --> 15:55they kind of work them their way into
  • 15:55 --> 15:58not being something of last resort,
  • 15:58 --> 16:00but being more mainstream
  • 16:00 --> 16:03in terms of practice.
  • 16:03 --> 16:05So can you kind of pick up the
  • 16:05 --> 16:08conversation there and tell us a little
  • 16:08 --> 16:10bit more about how theranostics is
  • 16:10 --> 16:12finding its way into clinical practice
  • 16:12 --> 16:15where it's still in clinical trials?
  • 16:15 --> 16:17You mentioned prior to the break that
  • 16:17 --> 16:19this really started with neuroendocrine
  • 16:19 --> 16:22tumors and was approved back in 2018.
  • 16:22 --> 16:25So is it now the case that everybody
  • 16:25 --> 16:27with neuroendocrine tumors are
  • 16:27 --> 16:29being offered theranostics or is
  • 16:29 --> 16:31it still kind of a niche thing?
  • 16:32 --> 16:36So one of the things to realize even
  • 16:36 --> 16:39before that is the administration
  • 16:39 --> 16:41of these therapies are complex,
  • 16:41 --> 16:46they require a multi specialty clinical team.
  • 16:46 --> 16:49And not everywhere that's available.
  • 16:49 --> 16:53So whenever you have that available and you
  • 16:53 --> 16:58have cancers that have indication to therapy,
  • 16:58 --> 17:02that's when these usually are more used or
  • 17:02 --> 17:06if patients are referred to cancer centers,
  • 17:06 --> 17:09which have specifically lines of
  • 17:09 --> 17:13therapies at the moment for GI cancers,
  • 17:13 --> 17:16these are available for gastroenterology,
  • 17:16 --> 17:18pancreatic cancers,
  • 17:18 --> 17:22for example for bronchial carcinoid or
  • 17:22 --> 17:27more rare types of neuroendocrine cancers.
  • 17:27 --> 17:31These are not on label FDA
  • 17:31 --> 17:33approved therapies.
  • 17:33 --> 17:36However, there are initial experiences
  • 17:36 --> 17:40of places who have used them on
  • 17:40 --> 17:43clinical trial basis or off label use,
  • 17:43 --> 17:47so every patient is different.
  • 17:49 --> 17:54Different set of findings and exams and
  • 17:54 --> 17:58genetic mutations and information really.
  • 17:58 --> 18:01And each cancer develops in a
  • 18:01 --> 18:02different way from another.
  • 18:02 --> 18:06So you won't find one cancer that has
  • 18:06 --> 18:09the exact genetic profile as another.
  • 18:09 --> 18:12So these have to be looked at in a
  • 18:12 --> 18:14very individualized way and I think
  • 18:14 --> 18:16that's one of the big challenges
  • 18:16 --> 18:19is always to pinpoint who is
  • 18:19 --> 18:21going to really benefit
  • 18:21 --> 18:22from these therapies?
  • 18:22 --> 18:25So patient selection
  • 18:25 --> 18:28plays a very important role and
  • 18:28 --> 18:31who can really get these therapies.
  • 18:31 --> 18:35These are patients that are usually discussed
  • 18:35 --> 18:37in multidisciplinary tumor boards
  • 18:37 --> 18:40which are meetings where multiple
  • 18:40 --> 18:43specialties of doctors come together
  • 18:43 --> 18:46to look at something and come up with
  • 18:46 --> 18:49a team opinion of what is the best
  • 18:49 --> 18:52approach. These are not usually
  • 18:52 --> 18:55patients with very initial staging
  • 18:55 --> 18:58of disease or very early.
  • 18:58 --> 19:00These are patients who have a history,
  • 19:00 --> 19:03who have had disease for a while or
  • 19:03 --> 19:05when they discover they have disease,
  • 19:05 --> 19:08it's not very localized.
  • 19:08 --> 19:15So any type of systemic therapy
  • 19:15 --> 19:17with theranostics at the moment,
  • 19:17 --> 19:20that's how it's been used.
  • 19:21 --> 19:25It's made its way prime time for
  • 19:25 --> 19:28GI specifically,
  • 19:28 --> 19:31but it's not yet widespread for
  • 19:31 --> 19:34every single type of neuroendocrine
  • 19:34 --> 19:38cancer and we're not there yet.
  • 19:38 --> 19:43There's a lot of pipeline development
  • 19:43 --> 19:47into which better receptors or targets
  • 19:47 --> 19:51we should use and as of this year,
  • 19:51 --> 19:532022, this was recently approved
  • 19:53 --> 19:55for prostate cancer.
  • 19:55 --> 19:58Another agent but the same concept.
  • 20:00 --> 20:04So it sounds like first off,
  • 20:04 --> 20:07there are certain cancers that
  • 20:07 --> 20:10are approved for theranostics and
  • 20:10 --> 20:13others that are not. Why is that?
  • 20:13 --> 20:17I mean if so many cancers have targets
  • 20:17 --> 20:20and as a breast cancer surgeon,
  • 20:20 --> 20:23I'm thinking about certainly breast cancer
  • 20:23 --> 20:26has a number of targets that we use all
  • 20:26 --> 20:30the time in terms of ER and PR and HER II.
  • 20:30 --> 20:32When we think about all
  • 20:32 --> 20:33kinds of other cancers,
  • 20:33 --> 20:36there are similar markers.
  • 20:36 --> 20:39What is it about some markers
  • 20:39 --> 20:42that make them good candidates
  • 20:42 --> 20:46for theranostics and makes other
  • 20:46 --> 20:49markers and other cancers not?
  • 20:50 --> 20:53Well, so specifically for breast cancer,
  • 20:53 --> 20:56I think we will get there,
  • 20:56 --> 20:59we just need a little time.
  • 20:59 --> 21:01So all these processes require
  • 21:01 --> 21:04something called radiolabeling,
  • 21:04 --> 21:07which means you have to attach a
  • 21:07 --> 21:10radioactive particle into these targets
  • 21:10 --> 21:13and radiolabeling is a difficult
  • 21:13 --> 21:16process that not always works
  • 21:16 --> 21:20with any target you need or want,
  • 21:20 --> 21:25but there is a lot of work being done for
  • 21:25 --> 21:29HER 2 targeting and for imaging.
  • 21:29 --> 21:33So it's bringing all these pieces
  • 21:33 --> 21:36of the technology together to make a
  • 21:36 --> 21:39specific agent a good candidate for a
  • 21:39 --> 21:43theranostics pair is what's hard.
  • 21:43 --> 21:46Just this technology
  • 21:46 --> 21:48is very new. If you think about it,
  • 21:48 --> 21:51it was first approved in the US four
  • 21:51 --> 21:53years ago and here we are four years
  • 21:53 --> 21:57later we have a second one in the market
  • 21:57 --> 22:00and there's multiple others in the pipeline.
  • 22:00 --> 22:04And I think also molecular imaging
  • 22:04 --> 22:07requires a lot of structure.
  • 22:07 --> 22:09So you have to have a radio chemist,
  • 22:09 --> 22:13you have to have sometimes a cyclotron.
  • 22:13 --> 22:16Which is where you generate
  • 22:16 --> 22:19these radioactive particles.
  • 22:19 --> 22:20They have 1/2 time,
  • 22:20 --> 22:23which means that they decay every
  • 22:23 --> 22:26one hour 5 hours or 10 hours
  • 22:26 --> 22:286 days depending on the agent.
  • 22:28 --> 22:32Half of what you generated is just gone,
  • 22:32 --> 22:33you don't have it anymore.
  • 22:33 --> 22:37So these technologies are difficult
  • 22:37 --> 22:41to develop and are hard to join
  • 22:41 --> 22:44a big team to work on something.
  • 22:44 --> 22:47So until we get there,
  • 22:47 --> 22:49it's just going to take a while.
  • 22:49 --> 22:51But it doesn't mean that the
  • 22:51 --> 22:53cancers are not suitable.
  • 22:53 --> 22:57It's just the time that the technology
  • 22:57 --> 23:01needs to get to deployment into
  • 23:01 --> 23:04clinical practice and widespread use.
  • 23:04 --> 23:10At the moment we don't have any of
  • 23:10 --> 23:15the newer alpha therapies.
  • 23:15 --> 23:18But the difference between these other
  • 23:18 --> 23:21therapies that we're looking at and
  • 23:21 --> 23:23what's currently approved,
  • 23:23 --> 23:26which is a better meter is basically
  • 23:26 --> 23:28how much damage to the tissues
  • 23:28 --> 23:31surrounding them they can make.
  • 23:31 --> 23:34And alpha therapies are much higher energy,
  • 23:34 --> 23:37which means they have a destruction
  • 23:37 --> 23:39power which is higher than lutetium.
  • 23:39 --> 23:43So these are expected also to
  • 23:43 --> 23:45revolutionize the market and
  • 23:45 --> 23:48how these therapies are used and
  • 23:48 --> 23:50approached because what's currently
  • 23:50 --> 23:51available,
  • 23:51 --> 23:54which is a beta doesn't destroy
  • 23:54 --> 23:57or shrink the tumor as much as we
  • 23:57 --> 23:59were hoping or we would like.
  • 23:59 --> 24:05So there is also this concept
  • 24:05 --> 24:07that is an evolving field.
  • 24:07 --> 24:10This is not a mature field at all.
  • 24:10 --> 24:13There's a lot of knowledge
  • 24:13 --> 24:15that we're still gaining from.
  • 24:15 --> 24:17The deployment of these therapies,
  • 24:17 --> 24:20the prostate cancer therapies
  • 24:20 --> 24:23specifically was initially approved
  • 24:23 --> 24:26for patients who failed a taxane
  • 24:26 --> 24:29based therapy and yet there were
  • 24:29 --> 24:32results published from a trial
  • 24:32 --> 24:35just recently showing that even in
  • 24:35 --> 24:37patients that don't fail therapy
  • 24:37 --> 24:39but have metastatic disease,
  • 24:39 --> 24:42they do have a benefit on them.
  • 24:42 --> 24:46So oncology trials are trials that
  • 24:46 --> 24:48they long for you to gather
  • 24:48 --> 24:50information enough to understand
  • 24:51 --> 24:53what really is happening.
  • 24:53 --> 24:55And on that point,
  • 24:55 --> 24:57you know in thinking about
  • 24:57 --> 24:59the role of theranostics,
  • 24:59 --> 25:02is it your perception that eventually
  • 25:02 --> 25:05these will replace external beam radiation?
  • 25:05 --> 25:09So standard radiation will now be given
  • 25:09 --> 25:12with the more targeted intravenous
  • 25:12 --> 25:16radiation of theranostics and
  • 25:16 --> 25:17if you believe that that's
  • 25:17 --> 25:18where the field is going,
  • 25:18 --> 25:21do we have the clinical trial data
  • 25:21 --> 25:24to suggest that theranostics is
  • 25:24 --> 25:27equally if not more efficacious
  • 25:27 --> 25:30than standard radiation therapy?
  • 25:31 --> 25:33I don't think we're there yet.
  • 25:33 --> 25:36I think they have complementary use.
  • 25:36 --> 25:38When you're thinking about radiation,
  • 25:38 --> 25:41you're thinking about
  • 25:41 --> 25:43external traditional radiation,
  • 25:43 --> 25:45you're thinking about local therapy.
  • 25:45 --> 25:48When you're thinking about theranostics,
  • 25:48 --> 25:51you're thinking about systemic therapy,
  • 25:51 --> 25:53which are two different concepts.
  • 25:53 --> 25:57So when someone has a small lung nodule and
  • 25:57 --> 26:01you want to target that one small nodule
  • 26:01 --> 26:04and there is no knowledge
  • 26:04 --> 26:06of widespread disease,
  • 26:06 --> 26:09but it's possible that external radiation
  • 26:09 --> 26:13would still be better than intravenous
  • 26:13 --> 26:17radiation because you have some
  • 26:17 --> 26:20side effects, but they're different
  • 26:20 --> 26:23from when we do intravenous radiation
  • 26:23 --> 26:26and then when patients have disease
  • 26:26 --> 26:29that we know that are not localized,
  • 26:29 --> 26:33that they can't have surgery to remove,
  • 26:33 --> 26:35just targeting one location
  • 26:35 --> 26:38is not going to be enough.
  • 26:38 --> 26:40That's when you do systemic
  • 26:40 --> 26:43therapy and you use theranostics,
  • 26:43 --> 26:46which is the same concept as chemotherapy,
  • 26:46 --> 26:48except now
  • 26:48 --> 26:52we're using radioactive chemotherapy.
  • 26:52 --> 26:56It's another term that's been
  • 26:56 --> 26:58used to treat these patients.
  • 26:58 --> 26:59So you're not really looking
  • 26:59 --> 27:01for a localized disease,
  • 27:01 --> 27:03but you're looking for systemic,
  • 27:03 --> 27:06widespread.
  • 27:07 --> 27:08And finally, you know,
  • 27:08 --> 27:11you had mentioned that one of the
  • 27:11 --> 27:14things that's very important is
  • 27:14 --> 27:15thinking about patient selection.
  • 27:15 --> 27:18So are there particular patients
  • 27:18 --> 27:22that are better suited or not
  • 27:22 --> 27:24suited to radioactive chemotherapy
  • 27:24 --> 27:26or this intravenous radiation.
  • 27:27 --> 27:32Yes. So one of the key concepts is that
  • 27:32 --> 27:36whatever target you are looking at,
  • 27:36 --> 27:38the patient has to have high
  • 27:38 --> 27:40expression of the target.
  • 27:40 --> 27:43So for example, a neuroendocrine patient
  • 27:43 --> 27:46when we do lutetium dotatate specifically,
  • 27:46 --> 27:50which is the therapy that's approved,
  • 27:50 --> 27:53we are targeting somatostatin
  • 27:53 --> 27:56receptor Type 2.
  • 27:56 --> 28:00So if the disease they have
  • 28:00 --> 28:02doesn't really express significant
  • 28:02 --> 28:05density of those receptors,
  • 28:05 --> 28:10then those patients are not great
  • 28:10 --> 28:12patients for that therapy,
  • 28:12 --> 28:15great candidates because you're not going
  • 28:15 --> 28:17to be targeting whatever they have.
  • 28:17 --> 28:21So having the target overly expressed
  • 28:21 --> 28:25in the disease is really key here
  • 28:25 --> 28:28and that's looked at by using the
  • 28:28 --> 28:31diagnostic agent with PET CT.
  • 28:32 --> 28:34Doctor Gabriela Spilberg is an assistant
  • 28:34 --> 28:36professor of radiology and biomedical
  • 28:36 --> 28:39imaging at the Yale School of Medicine.
  • 28:39 --> 28:41If you have questions,
  • 28:41 --> 28:43the address is canceranswers@yale.edu,
  • 28:43 --> 28:45and past editions of the program
  • 28:45 --> 28:48are available in audio and written
  • 28:48 --> 28:49form at yalecancercenter.org.
  • 28:49 --> 28:51We hope you'll join us next week to
  • 28:51 --> 28:53learn more about the fight against
  • 28:53 --> 28:55cancer here on Connecticut Public Radio.
  • 28:55 --> 28:57Funding for Yale Cancer Answers is
  • 28:57 --> 29:00provided by Smilow Cancer Hospital.