Skip to Main Content
All Podcasts

Innovation in the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer

Transcript

  • 00:00 --> 00:02Funding for Yale Cancer Answers is
  • 00:02 --> 00:04provided by Smilow Cancer Hospital.
  • 00:06 --> 00:08Welcome to Yale Cancer Answers with
  • 00:08 --> 00:10your host, doctor Anees Chagpar.
  • 00:10 --> 00:11Yale Cancer Answers features
  • 00:11 --> 00:13the latest information on cancer
  • 00:13 --> 00:15care by welcoming oncologists and
  • 00:15 --> 00:17specialists who are in the forefront
  • 00:17 --> 00:19of the battle to fight cancer.
  • 00:19 --> 00:22This week it's a conversation about
  • 00:22 --> 00:24innovations in the diagnosis of
  • 00:24 --> 00:25lung cancer with Doctor Sanket
  • 00:25 --> 00:27Thakore and Kyle Bramley.
  • 00:27 --> 00:28Doctor Bramley is an assistant
  • 00:28 --> 00:30professor of medicine and Doctor
  • 00:30 --> 00:32Thakur as an instructor of medicine
  • 00:32 --> 00:33in the Department of Interventional
  • 00:33 --> 00:36Pulmonology at the Yale School of Medicine,
  • 00:36 --> 00:38where Doctor Chagpar is a
  • 00:38 --> 00:39professor of surgical oncology.
  • 00:42 --> 00:44Kyle, I'm gonna start with you.
  • 00:44 --> 00:45Maybe both of you can tell us
  • 00:45 --> 00:47a little bit about yourselves
  • 00:47 --> 00:49and what it is you do.
  • 00:50 --> 00:52Sure, I'm an interventional
  • 00:52 --> 00:54pulmonologist and critical care doctor.
  • 00:54 --> 00:56I often struggle to
  • 00:56 --> 00:57describe what that means.
  • 00:57 --> 00:59And so I'm a pulmonologist,
  • 00:59 --> 01:01a lung doctor who specializes
  • 01:01 --> 01:03in minimally invasive procedures
  • 01:03 --> 01:05to diagnose cancers and other
  • 01:05 --> 01:07lesions inside the chest.
  • 01:08 --> 01:11And Sanket, how about you?
  • 01:12 --> 01:15I do very similar to what
  • 01:15 --> 01:17Kyle just described as well.
  • 01:17 --> 01:19I'm also an interventional
  • 01:19 --> 01:20pulmonologist and I'm also
  • 01:20 --> 01:21a critical care doctor.
  • 01:21 --> 01:24So we commonly take care of a lot
  • 01:24 --> 01:27of patients with lung cancer.
  • 01:27 --> 01:30So you know it is lung Cancer Awareness
  • 01:30 --> 01:34Month and I think a lot of people know
  • 01:34 --> 01:37that lung cancer is a deadly cancer.
  • 01:37 --> 01:40But what people may not know is that
  • 01:40 --> 01:43we actually have decent screening
  • 01:43 --> 01:44for lung cancer.
  • 01:44 --> 01:46And we know a little bit about the
  • 01:46 --> 01:49risk factors that put people at risk.
  • 01:49 --> 01:50One of the ones that we
  • 01:50 --> 01:51often talk about is smoking.
  • 01:51 --> 01:54But Kyle, do you want to tell us a
  • 01:54 --> 01:56little bit about what's available in
  • 01:56 --> 01:59terms of screening for lung cancer,
  • 01:59 --> 02:02who's eligible for it and why it's important?
  • 02:02 --> 02:04Sure. So as you said,
  • 02:04 --> 02:06lung cancer screening is very important.
  • 02:06 --> 02:08And recently we have some very good
  • 02:08 --> 02:10data that suggests that people who
  • 02:10 --> 02:12are at an increased risk of getting
  • 02:12 --> 02:14lung cancer during their lifetime
  • 02:14 --> 02:16can be screened with a CAT scan
  • 02:16 --> 02:19and so patients who are eligible are
  • 02:19 --> 02:21patients who've had a long smoking
  • 02:21 --> 02:23history and are over the age of 55.
  • 02:23 --> 02:25The way that the screening generally works
  • 02:25 --> 02:27is you have a meeting with a provider to
  • 02:27 --> 02:30talk about what your risk factors are,
  • 02:30 --> 02:33to talk about what the screening may show,
  • 02:33 --> 02:37and then receive an annual CAT scan.
  • 02:37 --> 02:40So it's a low dose of radiation
  • 02:40 --> 02:42cat scan that's performed yearly
  • 02:42 --> 02:45for three years with the idea of
  • 02:45 --> 02:47looking for lung cancers when they're
  • 02:47 --> 02:49still small and more easily treatable.
  • 02:53 --> 02:57Sanket, just to follow up on what Kyle said,
  • 02:59 --> 03:02how much of a
  • 03:02 --> 03:04smoking history do you need
  • 03:04 --> 03:06to have, like if you've smoked one
  • 03:06 --> 03:08cigarette in your entire life does
  • 03:08 --> 03:10that count or do you need to have
  • 03:10 --> 03:12smoked every day for 50 years?
  • 03:12 --> 03:15How does that work and
  • 03:15 --> 03:16my second question,
  • 03:16 --> 03:20why is it annual just for three years?
  • 03:20 --> 03:23So you have your screening for three years,
  • 03:23 --> 03:27but could you not get a lung cancer in
  • 03:27 --> 03:30year 4, 5, 6 if you continue to smoke?
  • 03:30 --> 03:34So let's tackle the first question.
  • 03:34 --> 03:38You're asking how long smoking
  • 03:38 --> 03:40history is indicated, right?
  • 03:40 --> 03:42And we generally
  • 03:42 --> 03:43describe smoking history
  • 03:43 --> 03:46by pack years smoking history.
  • 03:46 --> 03:49So according to the
  • 03:49 --> 03:50lung cancer screening guidelines,
  • 03:50 --> 03:53we look for at least 20 pack
  • 03:53 --> 03:55years of smoking history.
  • 03:55 --> 03:58What that means is that if
  • 03:58 --> 04:00somebody smokes about a pack
  • 04:00 --> 04:02a day for straight 20 years,
  • 04:02 --> 04:05they would qualify for lung cancer screening,
  • 04:05 --> 04:08Or similarly if they smoked half
  • 04:08 --> 04:10a pack a day for 40 years or two
  • 04:10 --> 04:13packs a day for 10 years, right.
  • 04:13 --> 04:16That is correct. So accumulatively,
  • 04:16 --> 04:19it has to be 20 packs a year for smoking
  • 04:19 --> 04:22history, and they would qualify for that.
  • 04:22 --> 04:24OK. And Kyle, maybe you can
  • 04:24 --> 04:26pick up on the question of why
  • 04:26 --> 04:28is it annual for three years,
  • 04:28 --> 04:30what happens after year three?
  • 04:30 --> 04:31The biggest part of that I would
  • 04:31 --> 04:33say is just that that's what the
  • 04:33 --> 04:34research has shown and that's what
  • 04:34 --> 04:35the research projects have done.
  • 04:35 --> 04:37I think a lot of us would continue
  • 04:37 --> 04:39to advocate for ongoing screening
  • 04:39 --> 04:41through the course of the lifetime
  • 04:41 --> 04:43depending on risk factors and
  • 04:43 --> 04:44their other health issues.
  • 04:44 --> 04:47Sanket, when we talk
  • 04:47 --> 04:49about screening, oftentimes the
  • 04:49 --> 04:52whole idea behind screening is
  • 04:52 --> 04:55to pick up these cancers
  • 04:55 --> 04:57before they are symptomatic.
  • 04:57 --> 04:59Oftentimes this is when these
  • 04:59 --> 05:01cancers are really small and
  • 05:01 --> 05:03presumably the most treatable.
  • 05:03 --> 05:04We know, however,
  • 05:04 --> 05:07that lung cancer is the leading cause of
  • 05:07 --> 05:10death both in men and women in this country.
  • 05:10 --> 05:12So does screening really work?
  • 05:12 --> 05:14I mean, are we picking up lung
  • 05:14 --> 05:15cancers when they're smaller?
  • 05:15 --> 05:17And if so,
  • 05:17 --> 05:19is there really good treatment for
  • 05:19 --> 05:21lung cancer when they're small
  • 05:21 --> 05:23such that we can actually improve
  • 05:23 --> 05:24survival rates?
  • 05:26 --> 05:29Do think that there is enough data to
  • 05:29 --> 05:31suggest that everyone who qualifies
  • 05:31 --> 05:34for the lung cancer screening and if
  • 05:34 --> 05:37they do not have any other medical
  • 05:37 --> 05:40problem that's going to kill them
  • 05:40 --> 05:42sooner than that lung cancer itself,
  • 05:42 --> 05:44then it is highly recommended that they
  • 05:44 --> 05:47do get the yearly lung cancer screening.
  • 05:47 --> 05:50Because if we catch it early, there is a
  • 05:50 --> 05:52definitive therapy like a surgical
  • 05:52 --> 05:55therapy when they can just
  • 05:55 --> 05:57go in and take it out.
  • 05:57 --> 05:58Part of the lung out.
  • 05:58 --> 06:00I will also add to that that
  • 06:00 --> 06:01we often think about,
  • 06:01 --> 06:03do we need to make this lung
  • 06:03 --> 06:04cancer screening change?
  • 06:04 --> 06:06Do we need to change criteria,
  • 06:06 --> 06:09do we need to make any fancy screening?
  • 06:09 --> 06:12That's not the point here.
  • 06:12 --> 06:15The point really being is that we
  • 06:15 --> 06:17have good lung cancer screening and
  • 06:17 --> 06:20let's see if we can get everyone
  • 06:20 --> 06:21who qualifies for that.
  • 06:21 --> 06:25Can we get them do the lung cancer screening?
  • 06:25 --> 06:27That's where the key is because
  • 06:27 --> 06:29if you look now at all the people
  • 06:29 --> 06:33who qualify for the lung cancer screening,
  • 06:33 --> 06:35even after having the lung cancer
  • 06:35 --> 06:38screening for close to 7-8 years
  • 06:38 --> 06:40now a very small percentage of those
  • 06:43 --> 06:45will get the lung cancer screening and
  • 06:45 --> 06:49this is where we can get the
  • 06:49 --> 06:51biggest advantage, if we can get
  • 06:51 --> 06:53all those patients to come and
  • 06:53 --> 06:55get the lung cancer screening.
  • 06:55 --> 06:57I mean it certainly sounds like
  • 06:57 --> 06:59it would be something that people who
  • 06:59 --> 07:02have more than a 20 pack year history of
  • 07:02 --> 07:04smoking should talk to their doctor about,
  • 07:04 --> 07:06especially if they can find these
  • 07:06 --> 07:09cancers at an earlier stage and
  • 07:09 --> 07:11potentially improve their outcomes.
  • 07:11 --> 07:13So that really brings us,
  • 07:13 --> 07:16Kyle to the next question which is,
  • 07:16 --> 07:19what happens next for a patient?
  • 07:20 --> 07:22Let's suppose that somebody who is
  • 07:22 --> 07:24listening to our show today listens
  • 07:24 --> 07:26to what Sanket says and goes and
  • 07:26 --> 07:28talks to their doctor.
  • 07:28 --> 07:31They get their low dose CT,
  • 07:31 --> 07:32and lo and behold,
  • 07:32 --> 07:34there's a lesion found.
  • 07:34 --> 07:35What happens then?
  • 07:36 --> 07:37So that's a great question.
  • 07:37 --> 07:39So it's always important to remember
  • 07:39 --> 07:41that a lot of the lesions that we find
  • 07:41 --> 07:43on these scans may not be cancerous.
  • 07:43 --> 07:46And so it's very important to meet
  • 07:46 --> 07:48with someone who has an expertise in
  • 07:48 --> 07:50this area to talk about what the risk
  • 07:50 --> 07:52of that lesion being a cancer is.
  • 07:52 --> 07:55In some patients there may be
  • 07:55 --> 07:56some characteristics on the
  • 07:56 --> 07:58scan that make us think that
  • 07:58 --> 08:00it's actually not a cancer and we
  • 08:00 --> 08:02may elect to just watch those.
  • 08:02 --> 08:05Over time, things like a small size
  • 08:05 --> 08:07or a location may be suggestive
  • 08:07 --> 08:09and some of those patients,
  • 08:09 --> 08:10those nodules are going to
  • 08:10 --> 08:11be concerning for cancer.
  • 08:11 --> 08:15And so additional workup will be necessary.
  • 08:15 --> 08:16And a lot of those cases,
  • 08:16 --> 08:18the patients may end up getting a biopsy,
  • 08:18 --> 08:21which can be done a variety of
  • 08:21 --> 08:22different ways where we actually
  • 08:22 --> 08:23go in and get a piece of that
  • 08:23 --> 08:26tissue to get a sample and then the
  • 08:26 --> 08:27pathologists will look at it under
  • 08:27 --> 08:29a microscope and be able to tell
  • 08:29 --> 08:31us exactly what we're dealing with.
  • 08:32 --> 08:34And so Sanket, do you want to walk
  • 08:34 --> 08:37us through some of the ways in
  • 08:37 --> 08:39which biopsies are done these days?
  • 08:39 --> 08:41I mean I would presume that many of
  • 08:41 --> 08:44them are are done simply with a needle
  • 08:44 --> 08:45and the CAT scan, is that right?
  • 08:47 --> 08:49Correct, but can I also add one
  • 08:49 --> 08:51thing, before we go to biopsy,
  • 08:51 --> 08:53when we look at the nodule,
  • 08:53 --> 08:54we generally like to think
  • 08:54 --> 08:55about three things.
  • 08:55 --> 08:57Whether that could be really,
  • 08:57 --> 08:59really low risk or that could be really,
  • 08:59 --> 09:01really high risk or that
  • 09:01 --> 09:02could be somewhere in between.
  • 09:02 --> 09:04So the very, very low risk are simple.
  • 09:04 --> 09:06We're just going to repeat a CT
  • 09:06 --> 09:08scan at a future time and see that
  • 09:08 --> 09:10nodule, what's its behavior, right.
  • 09:10 --> 09:13On the flip side, the very,
  • 09:13 --> 09:15very high risk are many
  • 09:15 --> 09:16times also straightforward.
  • 09:16 --> 09:18Sometimes we also choose
  • 09:18 --> 09:19hey, you know what,
  • 09:19 --> 09:21here biopsy is not even needed.
  • 09:21 --> 09:23So surgeons might just decide that
  • 09:23 --> 09:26this is such a high risk that even
  • 09:26 --> 09:28the biopsy doesn't give us an answer.
  • 09:29 --> 09:30I'm not going to be able to have
  • 09:30 --> 09:32a good night's sleep with that.
  • 09:32 --> 09:34So in that case is what we surgeons
  • 09:34 --> 09:35decide that we are just
  • 09:35 --> 09:37going to go and take it out and
  • 09:37 --> 09:38that's a very common approach.
  • 09:38 --> 09:41It's important for patients to know
  • 09:41 --> 09:43that then the challenging patient
  • 09:43 --> 09:46populations are the one we just follow.
  • 09:46 --> 09:47In between,
  • 09:47 --> 09:48to be honest,
  • 09:48 --> 09:50most of them fit right in
  • 09:50 --> 09:53between though and that's the time
  • 09:53 --> 09:55that we think about the biopsy part of it.
  • 09:56 --> 09:59And so Kyle, one would think that
  • 09:59 --> 10:02the decision between which way to
  • 10:02 --> 10:04biopsy this nodule really might depend
  • 10:04 --> 10:07on where exactly the nodule was.
  • 10:07 --> 10:10I mean is this something that's
  • 10:10 --> 10:12amenable to a needle biopsy
  • 10:12 --> 10:14under CT guidance or whether it's
  • 10:14 --> 10:17more amenable to a bronchoscopy?
  • 10:17 --> 10:19Guided biopsy, is that right?
  • 10:20 --> 10:22Yeah. It really does depend a lot
  • 10:22 --> 10:23on the location and where it's
  • 10:23 --> 10:25located relative to the airways and
  • 10:25 --> 10:27the other structures in the chest.
  • 10:27 --> 10:29And so nodules that are further out
  • 10:29 --> 10:30into the periphery of the lung,
  • 10:30 --> 10:32closer to the chest wall are usually
  • 10:32 --> 10:34more amenable to a CT guided approach
  • 10:34 --> 10:35or even possibly an ultrasound
  • 10:35 --> 10:36guided approach if it's really
  • 10:36 --> 10:38right at the edge of the lung.
  • 10:38 --> 10:40Whereas things that are more centrally
  • 10:40 --> 10:41located and especially if they're
  • 10:41 --> 10:43located in closer proximity to one of
  • 10:43 --> 10:45the larger airways or branches of the
  • 10:45 --> 10:47windpipe that go out into the lungs,
  • 10:47 --> 10:49we often think about taking a more
  • 10:49 --> 10:50bronchoscopic approach because we'll be
  • 10:50 --> 10:53able to sample it with a higher efficiency.
  • 10:53 --> 10:58And so you know Sanket, when we think
  • 10:58 --> 11:00about these different techniques,
  • 11:00 --> 11:04are there risks and
  • 11:04 --> 11:06benefits associated with
  • 11:06 --> 11:08these and
  • 11:08 --> 11:10can you talk a little bit more about
  • 11:10 --> 11:13what do you talk to patients about
  • 11:13 --> 11:15when they're undergoing these biopsies
  • 11:15 --> 11:17in terms of risks and benefits?
  • 11:18 --> 11:19Yeah. And and there are two
  • 11:19 --> 11:20ways to think about that.
  • 11:20 --> 11:23One would be overall
  • 11:23 --> 11:25in terms of in general how are we
  • 11:25 --> 11:27going to find these overall not
  • 11:27 --> 11:29just diagnosis but the staging
  • 11:29 --> 11:32as well and how are we going to
  • 11:32 --> 11:34soon get them to the treatment
  • 11:34 --> 11:35because that's the ultimate goal.
  • 11:35 --> 11:37And then also we have to think
  • 11:37 --> 11:39about risk and benefit of that and
  • 11:39 --> 11:41then on the day of the procedure
  • 11:41 --> 11:43and risk and benefit of
  • 11:43 --> 11:45those individual procedures.
  • 11:45 --> 11:47So when you do a CT guided biopsy,
  • 11:47 --> 11:48the risk
  • 11:48 --> 11:50that we think about the most
  • 11:50 --> 11:52common one would be lung collapse
  • 11:52 --> 11:55and that risk can be as high as
  • 11:55 --> 11:57about 20 to 30% depending on what
  • 11:57 --> 11:59literature that you're looking at.
  • 11:59 --> 12:01And there is a fair number of those
  • 12:01 --> 12:03patients that end up having a chest tube
  • 12:03 --> 12:06which is a treatment of those lung
  • 12:06 --> 12:08collapse and a fair number of those
  • 12:08 --> 12:11spaces and might end up spending a few
  • 12:11 --> 12:14days in the hospital because of that.
  • 12:14 --> 12:16And then the other risk factors
  • 12:16 --> 12:18would be bleeding from that.
  • 12:18 --> 12:19And the same way when we do
  • 12:19 --> 12:21those with the bronchoscopy,
  • 12:21 --> 12:25then the risk of lung cholestatic is
  • 12:25 --> 12:27significantly low under 2% and
  • 12:27 --> 12:29then there is risk of bleeding
  • 12:29 --> 12:32as well which is under 1 to 2%.
  • 12:32 --> 12:33And these are the most common risks
  • 12:33 --> 12:35that risk we think about,
  • 12:35 --> 12:37but at the same time we also think
  • 12:37 --> 12:39about the diagnostic success,
  • 12:39 --> 12:43because there is always a benefit versus risk ratio.
  • 12:43 --> 12:45So when you think about the CT
  • 12:45 --> 12:48guided biopsy as of today what we know
  • 12:48 --> 12:51is that on an average the success
  • 12:51 --> 12:53is around 85 to 90%,
  • 12:53 --> 12:56that depends on the size of the nodule,
  • 12:56 --> 12:58characteristic of the nodule.
  • 12:58 --> 12:59And on the flip side,
  • 12:59 --> 13:03when we go with the bronchoscope, as of now,
  • 13:03 --> 13:05the diagnostic success is
  • 13:05 --> 13:07somewhere in a range of around 70%.
  • 13:07 --> 13:09So there is a trade off there
  • 13:09 --> 13:11when you think about an approach.
  • 13:11 --> 13:14We're going to take a
  • 13:14 --> 13:16short break for a medical minute.
  • 13:16 --> 13:18When we come back, we'll learn more about
  • 13:18 --> 13:21lung cancer diagnosis with my guests,
  • 13:21 --> 13:23Drs. Sanket Thakore and Kyle Bramley.
  • 13:24 --> 13:26Funding for Yale Cancer Answers
  • 13:26 --> 13:28comes from Smilow Cancer Hospital,
  • 13:28 --> 13:30where their Center for Gastrointestinal
  • 13:30 --> 13:32Cancers provides patients with
  • 13:32 --> 13:34gastric cancers a comprehensive,
  • 13:34 --> 13:35multidisciplinary approach to
  • 13:35 --> 13:37the treatment of their cancer,
  • 13:37 --> 13:40including clinical trials.
  • 13:40 --> 13:43Smilowcancerhospital.org.
  • 13:43 --> 13:45There are over 16.9 million
  • 13:45 --> 13:48cancer survivors in the US and
  • 13:48 --> 13:50over 240,000 here in Connecticut.
  • 13:50 --> 13:52Completing treatment for cancer
  • 13:52 --> 13:54is a very exciting milestone,
  • 13:54 --> 13:56but cancer and its treatment can
  • 13:56 --> 13:58be a life changing experience.
  • 13:58 --> 14:00The return to normal activities
  • 14:00 --> 14:02and relationships may be difficult
  • 14:02 --> 14:04and cancer survivors may face
  • 14:04 --> 14:06other long term side effects of
  • 14:06 --> 14:08cancer including heart problems,
  • 14:08 --> 14:10osteoporosis, fertility issues,
  • 14:10 --> 14:13and an increased risk of second cancers.
  • 14:13 --> 14:16Resources for cancer survivors are
  • 14:16 --> 14:18available at federally designated
  • 14:18 --> 14:19Comprehensive cancer centers,
  • 14:19 --> 14:21such as Yale Cancer Center
  • 14:21 --> 14:24and Smilow Cancer Hospital,
  • 14:24 --> 14:26to keep cancer survivors well
  • 14:26 --> 14:28and focused on healthy living.
  • 14:28 --> 14:30The Smilow Cancer Hospital Survivorship
  • 14:30 --> 14:32Clinic focuses on providing guidance
  • 14:32 --> 14:34and direction to empower survivors to
  • 14:34 --> 14:37take steps to maximize their health,
  • 14:37 --> 14:38quality of life,
  • 14:38 --> 14:39and longevity.
  • 14:39 --> 14:42More information is available at
  • 14:42 --> 14:44yalecancercenter.org. You're listening to
  • 14:44 --> 14:45Connecticut Public Radio.
  • 14:46 --> 14:48Welcome back to Yale Cancer Answers.
  • 14:48 --> 14:50This is doctor Anees Chagpar and
  • 14:50 --> 14:52I'm joined tonight by my guests,
  • 14:52 --> 14:54Dr. Sanket Thakore and Kyle Bramley.
  • 14:54 --> 14:56We're talking about advances in
  • 14:56 --> 14:59diagnosis of lung cancer in honor
  • 14:59 --> 15:01of Lung Cancer Awareness Month.
  • 15:01 --> 15:03Now right before the break,
  • 15:03 --> 15:05we were talking about kind of
  • 15:05 --> 15:07the two different ways lung
  • 15:07 --> 15:09cancer is often diagnosed.
  • 15:09 --> 15:13One is with a CT guided needle biopsy,
  • 15:13 --> 15:15the other is
  • 15:15 --> 15:16with the bronchoscopic approach.
  • 15:16 --> 15:20Kyle, before the break
  • 15:20 --> 15:23you were telling us that a lot of
  • 15:23 --> 15:26this really depends on where the
  • 15:26 --> 15:29tumor is located and one would
  • 15:29 --> 15:32think that if you had a peripheral
  • 15:32 --> 15:35lesion and you didn't want to get
  • 15:35 --> 15:37a CT guided biopsy because you were
  • 15:37 --> 15:40afraid of the risk of of lung collapse,
  • 15:41 --> 15:44is there a way that bronchoscopy can
  • 15:44 --> 15:47get to those lesions or is that
  • 15:47 --> 15:50completely not amenable given the
  • 15:50 --> 15:52fact that it's not centrally located?
  • 15:53 --> 15:54That's a great question.
  • 15:54 --> 15:55So traditionally, we were very
  • 15:55 --> 15:57limited by the tools that we had to
  • 15:57 --> 15:58bronchoscopically work ourselves
  • 15:58 --> 16:00out into the periphery of the lung.
  • 16:00 --> 16:03We were using a lot of electromagnetic
  • 16:03 --> 16:05navigation where we essentially put
  • 16:05 --> 16:07an electromagnetic field around the
  • 16:07 --> 16:10patient and then we correlate that
  • 16:10 --> 16:12electromagnetic field to the CAT scan that
  • 16:12 --> 16:14diagnosed the nodule and then we would
  • 16:14 --> 16:15essentially
  • 16:15 --> 16:18use a computer to make a GPS
  • 16:18 --> 16:20like signal that would allow us
  • 16:20 --> 16:22to drive out into the lungs.
  • 16:22 --> 16:24And that increased our yield some,
  • 16:24 --> 16:27but we were still very limited by the tools,
  • 16:27 --> 16:28by the size of the instruments
  • 16:28 --> 16:31and also by our ability to make
  • 16:31 --> 16:33small adjustments in our navigation
  • 16:33 --> 16:35when we drove out to that nodule.
  • 16:35 --> 16:37One of the biggest advances
  • 16:37 --> 16:38for our field as interventional
  • 16:38 --> 16:40pulmonologists and NOTE Confidence: 0.858700948
  • 16:40 --> 16:43the people interested in
  • 16:43 --> 16:45thoracic cancers in general has been
  • 16:45 --> 16:50the new tool that we've all started using,
  • 16:50 --> 16:53which is the robotic bronchoscopy.
  • 16:53 --> 16:54And so it's different than a regular
  • 16:54 --> 16:56bronchoscopy in that I'm not standing
  • 16:56 --> 16:57there driving it with my hands.
  • 16:57 --> 17:00There's actually a robot arm that
  • 17:00 --> 17:02will drive out into the periphery.
  • 17:02 --> 17:04It has the advantage of its much
  • 17:04 --> 17:06smaller than our standard bronchoscopes.
  • 17:06 --> 17:08It's also much stiffer,
  • 17:08 --> 17:10much more navigable into the airways.
  • 17:10 --> 17:12And so we can drive out much further
  • 17:12 --> 17:14into the airways than we used to.
  • 17:14 --> 17:17We were also very limited by our
  • 17:17 --> 17:19ability to biopsy things that didn't
  • 17:19 --> 17:21have an airway that went directly
  • 17:21 --> 17:23to them in the past and with
  • 17:23 --> 17:24the robotic bronchoscopy,
  • 17:24 --> 17:26we can essentially know where
  • 17:26 --> 17:28we are in space,
  • 17:28 --> 17:31drive out to the lesion or
  • 17:31 --> 17:33next to the lesion and now pass
  • 17:33 --> 17:35instruments across the airway
  • 17:35 --> 17:37wall into the lung tissue itself.
  • 17:37 --> 17:41So it's a very new
  • 17:41 --> 17:43instrument that we're using,
  • 17:43 --> 17:45but the preliminary literature
  • 17:45 --> 17:47suggests that the diagnostic yield
  • 17:47 --> 17:49is much higher and certainly
  • 17:49 --> 17:51approaching the diagnostic rates
  • 17:51 --> 17:54that we've classically seen with
  • 17:54 --> 17:56Transthoracic CT guided biopsies.
  • 17:56 --> 17:58One of the things that we can do is
  • 17:58 --> 18:01now that we can actually make small
  • 18:01 --> 18:03changes because the catheter is much
  • 18:03 --> 18:05stiffer and more easy to navigate.
  • 18:05 --> 18:06We can actually incorporate that
  • 18:06 --> 18:08with a live image guidance as well.
  • 18:08 --> 18:10And so we can actually take a CT scan
  • 18:10 --> 18:12while the patient is having a bronchoscopy.
  • 18:12 --> 18:14Make sure that we're in the lesion.
  • 18:14 --> 18:16Make sure that we're getting a
  • 18:16 --> 18:18sample and can make small adjustments
  • 18:18 --> 18:20if we're not inside the lesion.
  • 18:20 --> 18:23So Sanket, that sounds really
  • 18:23 --> 18:26quite great that you'd be able to
  • 18:26 --> 18:28get a higher diagnostic yield.
  • 18:28 --> 18:31But it also sounds like,
  • 18:31 --> 18:34especially if you're taking
  • 18:34 --> 18:36these stiffer tubes and going
  • 18:36 --> 18:39across the actual parenchyma or
  • 18:39 --> 18:41the actual tissue of the lung,
  • 18:41 --> 18:43that you might actually see
  • 18:43 --> 18:44higher rates of bleeding.
  • 18:44 --> 18:47So have have you seen an increase in
  • 18:47 --> 18:50complication rates with robotics as well?
  • 18:51 --> 18:53No. In fact, if anything,
  • 18:53 --> 18:56the risk of bleeding is less than
  • 18:56 --> 18:58the traditional bronchoscopy because
  • 18:58 --> 19:00in general when those nodules
  • 19:00 --> 19:02are in a peripheral of the lung,
  • 19:02 --> 19:05your vessels starts to get smaller.
  • 19:05 --> 19:07So that kind of decreases
  • 19:07 --> 19:09the risk of the bleeding.
  • 19:09 --> 19:11And I will add to that, one
  • 19:11 --> 19:13of the other advantage of the
  • 19:13 --> 19:15bronchoscopic biopsy is that
  • 19:15 --> 19:17if someone was going to bleed
  • 19:17 --> 19:18you're already in the airways,
  • 19:18 --> 19:20so you can kind of fix it
  • 19:20 --> 19:21right then and there.
  • 19:21 --> 19:23By fix it you mean that you can
  • 19:23 --> 19:25coagulate the vessels on the inside
  • 19:25 --> 19:28because you have the tools to do that?
  • 19:28 --> 19:31Correct. And we can tamponade that area.
  • 19:31 --> 19:33So they would not have any
  • 19:33 --> 19:35complications from that bleeding, that
  • 19:35 --> 19:37takes care of the stopping part,
  • 19:37 --> 19:40but we help them not
  • 19:40 --> 19:42develop any complications.
  • 19:42 --> 19:45And so Kyle, it sounds like
  • 19:45 --> 19:47this is new technology.
  • 19:47 --> 19:49Is this widely available and
  • 19:49 --> 19:51is it covered by insurance?
  • 19:51 --> 19:54Bronchoscopic biopsies in
  • 19:54 --> 19:56truth have always been covered
  • 19:56 --> 19:59by most insurances.
  • 19:59 --> 20:00Essentially all insurances,
  • 20:00 --> 20:01they certainly want patients
  • 20:01 --> 20:03to get their lung
  • 20:03 --> 20:05cancer diagnosed and treated.
  • 20:06 --> 20:08The other part of the question,
  • 20:08 --> 20:10is it widely available.
  • 20:10 --> 20:12I mean one would think that
  • 20:12 --> 20:14bronchoscopy is pretty widely available.
  • 20:14 --> 20:16I think most most people know
  • 20:16 --> 20:18that their pulmonary doctor
  • 20:18 --> 20:21can can do bronchoscopy,
  • 20:21 --> 20:24but this whole concept of adding
  • 20:24 --> 20:26a robot,
  • 20:26 --> 20:28it sounds like that's a little
  • 20:28 --> 20:31avant-garde and may not be
  • 20:31 --> 20:33necessarily available at
  • 20:33 --> 20:36the local pulmonologist.
  • 20:40 --> 20:42Is that right or is this
  • 20:42 --> 20:44something that is more ubiquitous?
  • 20:44 --> 20:47No. At the current time it's really
  • 20:47 --> 20:48centralized around large hospitals
  • 20:48 --> 20:51and large academic centers and
  • 20:51 --> 20:53certainly large hospital systems.
  • 20:53 --> 20:55It's certainly not a procedure that
  • 20:55 --> 20:58at least I don't think will be widely
  • 20:58 --> 20:59adopted by pulmonologists universally.
  • 20:59 --> 21:03It really does require some extra
  • 21:03 --> 21:05training and expertise and obviously
  • 21:05 --> 21:09the bronchoscopic skills to do it.
  • 21:09 --> 21:12There's definitely a learning
  • 21:12 --> 21:15curve associated with it and so I don't
  • 21:15 --> 21:16think it will be universally adopted.
  • 21:16 --> 21:18And so it's really just in large
  • 21:18 --> 21:20hospital systems right now.
  • 21:21 --> 21:22And second,
  • 21:22 --> 21:24when we think about robotics
  • 21:24 --> 21:27it certainly has started to really make
  • 21:27 --> 21:31its foray into the surgical subspecialty.
  • 21:31 --> 21:33So certainly we've talked on
  • 21:33 --> 21:36this show about how robotics have
  • 21:36 --> 21:38entered the operating room for
  • 21:38 --> 21:40cancers like prostate cancer,
  • 21:40 --> 21:43gynecologic cancers, et cetera.
  • 21:43 --> 21:47But that technology has a cost, right.
  • 21:51 --> 21:52I realize that this is newer
  • 21:52 --> 21:55technology in terms of bronchoscopy,
  • 21:55 --> 21:58but have people looked at the cost of
  • 21:58 --> 22:00robotic bronchoscopy and compared it
  • 22:00 --> 22:02to standard bronchoscopy?
  • 22:02 --> 22:06A cost effectiveness analysis to see
  • 22:06 --> 22:10whether or not this actually does
  • 22:10 --> 22:14add value and if it is more expensive,
  • 22:14 --> 22:17who bears the brunt of that cost?
  • 22:17 --> 22:19Is it the patient or is that really
  • 22:19 --> 22:22something that is being covered by insurance?
  • 22:28 --> 22:31Yeah. So when we we are comparing the
  • 22:31 --> 22:35robotic with the traditional bronchoscopy,
  • 22:35 --> 22:38I would also add that the navigational
  • 22:38 --> 22:41bronchoscopy part of that
  • 22:41 --> 22:43already has been there for several years now.
  • 22:43 --> 22:46It was just not as good as
  • 22:46 --> 22:47the robotic bronchoscopy.
  • 22:47 --> 22:49So when you think about switching
  • 22:49 --> 22:51from the traditional approaches
  • 22:51 --> 22:53to the robotic bronchoscopy,
  • 22:53 --> 22:56yes, a hospital has to
  • 22:56 --> 22:57make some investment up front
  • 22:57 --> 23:00to get this kind of technology.
  • 23:00 --> 23:02But the cause that drips down
  • 23:02 --> 23:04to the patient that has not,
  • 23:04 --> 23:06it's not going to change compared
  • 23:06 --> 23:09to what we are already doing with
  • 23:09 --> 23:11the navigational bronchoscopy.
  • 23:11 --> 23:14So that's an important part to note.
  • 23:14 --> 23:16The second part to that question
  • 23:16 --> 23:18is that is it adding any value?
  • 23:18 --> 23:21And I do think that it does add
  • 23:21 --> 23:23value in two ways.
  • 23:23 --> 23:25You're going to improve
  • 23:25 --> 23:27the diagnostic success.
  • 23:27 --> 23:27And two,
  • 23:27 --> 23:30when we do the robotic bronchoscopy,
  • 23:30 --> 23:36it also allows us to do a second procedure
  • 23:36 --> 23:39what we call endobronchial ultrasound,
  • 23:39 --> 23:40which is really important for
  • 23:40 --> 23:42those lung cancer patients.
  • 23:42 --> 23:45Because that allows us to take
  • 23:45 --> 23:47samples of those lymph nodes in
  • 23:47 --> 23:50the chest, in the mediastinum,
  • 23:50 --> 23:52which helps us with the lung cancer staging.
  • 23:52 --> 23:54Because when we think about
  • 23:54 --> 23:55lung cancer diagnosis,
  • 23:55 --> 23:58we're thinking about the diagnosis
  • 23:58 --> 24:00and staging simultaneously.
  • 24:00 --> 24:03Those are not two separate things.
  • 24:03 --> 24:05When you look at national data,
  • 24:05 --> 24:07every time a person who has a nodule
  • 24:07 --> 24:11that is suspected to be a lung cancer,
  • 24:11 --> 24:12the number of biopsy
  • 24:12 --> 24:15that you do on separate days,
  • 24:15 --> 24:17that delays their care by on
  • 24:17 --> 24:19an average about 17 days.
  • 24:19 --> 24:24So what you want to focus on is to not
  • 24:24 --> 24:26just improve the diagnostic success,
  • 24:26 --> 24:28but you also want to minimize
  • 24:28 --> 24:31the number of boxes that they go
  • 24:31 --> 24:33through on a separate occasion.
  • 24:33 --> 24:35Because what that's going to allow you
  • 24:35 --> 24:38is to not just finish the diagnosis
  • 24:38 --> 24:40but also the lung cancer staging.
  • 24:40 --> 24:43You're going to get them all the information
  • 24:43 --> 24:45that you need sooner and they can
  • 24:45 --> 24:47get the therapy sooner and that's
  • 24:47 --> 24:49the real value of this technology.
  • 24:51 --> 24:53And so Kyle picking up on that,
  • 24:53 --> 24:55I mean before the robot came
  • 24:55 --> 24:58along in terms of staging,
  • 24:58 --> 25:01was that done on a different day
  • 25:01 --> 25:03because a different test was required?
  • 25:03 --> 25:05In other words, you would need to
  • 25:05 --> 25:07do a mediastinoscopy or something
  • 25:07 --> 25:10different than a standard bronchoscopy.
  • 25:10 --> 25:13Yeah, in patients who we have
  • 25:13 --> 25:15any concern that the cancer
  • 25:15 --> 25:17may have spread to the lymph nodes
  • 25:19 --> 25:20they need their mediastinum staged,
  • 25:20 --> 25:22and there's two ways to do that.
  • 25:22 --> 25:24One is with a mediastinoscopy,
  • 25:24 --> 25:26which is an older technique that's still
  • 25:26 --> 25:29in use for patients who need confirmation.
  • 25:29 --> 25:31But because we can do it minimally
  • 25:31 --> 25:33invasive with endobronchial ultrasound
  • 25:33 --> 25:35as Sanket was talking about,
  • 25:35 --> 25:37that's really become the first
  • 25:37 --> 25:39choice for mediastinal staging.
  • 25:39 --> 25:41And so we have lots of patients
  • 25:41 --> 25:43who undergo that procedure.
  • 25:43 --> 25:45But if a diagnosis is not made, well,
  • 25:45 --> 25:47it's good news because it means that the
  • 25:47 --> 25:49cancer hasn't spread to the lymph nodes.
  • 25:49 --> 25:51But a lot of those patients end up
  • 25:51 --> 25:53going on for a second test to get a
  • 25:53 --> 25:54biopsy of the actual nodule if they
  • 25:54 --> 25:56needed that before they underwent their
  • 25:56 --> 25:58definitive treatment for their cancer.
  • 25:58 --> 26:00And so in terms of cost,
  • 26:00 --> 26:03certainly there's a time cost
  • 26:03 --> 26:06that's going to be improved by
  • 26:06 --> 26:09having two procedures done at once,
  • 26:09 --> 26:12but also the just the cost of the procedures,
  • 26:12 --> 26:13I think too having two procedures
  • 26:13 --> 26:16is going to be more expensive and
  • 26:16 --> 26:17especially if there's complications
  • 26:17 --> 26:19from those procedures then that's
  • 26:19 --> 26:20going to add to the patients healthcare costs.
  • 26:24 --> 26:27Sanket, where do you see the
  • 26:27 --> 26:30field going now that you have the
  • 26:30 --> 26:33robot and this ability to do
  • 26:33 --> 26:35a bronchial ultrasound and biopsy
  • 26:35 --> 26:38these lymph nodes at the same time?
  • 26:38 --> 26:40It sounds like that certainly
  • 26:40 --> 26:41has been one of the,
  • 26:41 --> 26:44if not the major advance in terms
  • 26:44 --> 26:47of diagnosis of lung cancer.
  • 26:47 --> 26:49Are there other things coming down on
  • 26:49 --> 26:51the horizon that you're particularly
  • 26:51 --> 26:53excited about in terms of lung cancer?
  • 26:56 --> 27:00Yes. So there there are a lot of things
  • 27:00 --> 27:03coming down the pipeline I would think and
  • 27:03 --> 27:05our expertise is more on the diagnosis
  • 27:05 --> 27:08part of that, but on the therapeutic part
  • 27:08 --> 27:11a lot of exciting development coming up,
  • 27:11 --> 27:13down the pipeline as well.
  • 27:13 --> 27:16In terms of newer targeted therapies,
  • 27:16 --> 27:19there are new targeted therapies every
  • 27:19 --> 27:22other month when you look up literature.
  • 27:22 --> 27:25So those things going to continue to improve.
  • 27:25 --> 27:27When we focus on the robotic
  • 27:27 --> 27:29bronchoscopy and all generally
  • 27:29 --> 27:31we're thinking about the early
  • 27:31 --> 27:33stage diagnosis and one of the
  • 27:33 --> 27:35important things that we
  • 27:35 --> 27:37need to focus on moving forward
  • 27:37 --> 27:40would be how can we cut down on
  • 27:40 --> 27:42the time from the nodule was found
  • 27:42 --> 27:46to the time when we treat them?
  • 27:46 --> 27:49And I think that's going to have a
  • 27:49 --> 27:51significant impact on an outcome here
  • 27:51 --> 27:54and try to get that cancer early
  • 27:54 --> 27:56because we are focusing on something
  • 27:56 --> 27:58called a stage shift.
  • 27:58 --> 28:01We know that when lung cancer
  • 28:01 --> 28:03is diagnosed in a late stage
  • 28:03 --> 28:07it has an outcome and
  • 28:07 --> 28:09identified survival under 10%
  • 28:09 --> 28:12compared to when you diagnose lung
  • 28:12 --> 28:15cancer early in stage one or two,
  • 28:15 --> 28:18then that survival is
  • 28:18 --> 28:20well above 70%.
  • 28:20 --> 28:21So that's our focus.
  • 28:21 --> 28:24We want to diagnose them as early
  • 28:24 --> 28:26as possible so that we can treat
  • 28:26 --> 28:28them as well as possible.
  • 28:28 --> 28:30Doctor Sanket Thakore is an instructor
  • 28:30 --> 28:32of medicine and doctor Kyle Bramley
  • 28:32 --> 28:34is an assistant professor of medicine
  • 28:34 --> 28:36in the Department of Interventional
  • 28:36 --> 28:39Pulmonology at the Yale School of Medicine.
  • 28:39 --> 28:41If you have questions,
  • 28:41 --> 28:43the address is canceranswers@yale.edu,
  • 28:43 --> 28:45and past editions of the program
  • 28:45 --> 28:48are available in audio and written
  • 28:48 --> 28:49form at yalecancercenter.org.
  • 28:49 --> 28:51We hope you'll join us next week to
  • 28:51 --> 28:53learn more about the fight against
  • 28:53 --> 28:55cancer here on Connecticut Public Radio.
  • 28:55 --> 28:57Funding for Yale Cancer Answers is
  • 28:57 --> 29:00provided by Smilow Cancer Hospital.